Focal length and autofocus speed

AA5Q9419_02-27-2015.jpg

A fast lens, such as Canon’s 85mm f1.2L II USM, can do wonders in terms of improving noise levels in indoor sports photos. When shooting wide open, at f/1.2, I can regularly use the shutter speed of about 1/800 sec and an ISO of 8000 in very dim light during basketball games or kendo events. For comparison, the same shutter speed at f/2.8 pushes the ISO to 16500 or even 25000. For a Canon EOS-1D X camera body, this increase in the ISO means a step from minimal noise levels to those that require dedicated post-processing.

The problem with the 85mm f1.2L II USM lens is that it focusses very slowly. Its optical elements are so massive that even thought the camera’s autofocus system sends correct commands, it takes considerable time for the motors to physically move the glass into position. The 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, on the other hand, focusses lightning-fast, particularly if the subject is shot from farther away, at the focal length of 200 mm (compared to 85 mm.)

The advantage of shooting from far away using a longer focal length is that an equivalent motion of the subject causes smaller apparent displacement on the sensor of the camera (think about the classical example of an airplane appearing to move very slowly when viewed from far away, while a bicyclist at 1 m away shooting through your field of view in a fraction of a second.) Because the apparent displacement is small, the optics has to be only slightly adjusted to track the subject.

The bottom line is that a longer but slower (higher minimum f-number) lens will produce noisier images, but will yield a higher success rate in terms of the number of sharp images. Therefore, for a critical photo shoot, I would start with the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, and after making sure that I have captured a few sharp images, I would switch to the 85mm f1.2L II USM to potentially get one or two spectacular ones.

More photos here: https://flic.kr/s/aHsk92gBmH

Shutter speed for kendo

AA5Q0451_03-28-2015.jpg

Selecting shutter speed for kendo photography is difficult, because the action is very uneven and explosive. Most of the time, the kendoka are relatively motionless, but the peak of the action is extremely fast and unpredictable (in fact, being unpredictable is part of the game.) The fact that the action usually takes place in a dimly lit gym makes matters even worse, so increasing the exposure time as much as possible is necessary for keeping the noise levels within reasonable limits.

During today’s kata seminar, I experimented with various shutter speeds and found that a setting around 1/650 sec is a reasonable compromise for capturing both the slow- and the fast-moving phases of the action. I was shooting with a 85mm f1.2L and a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lenses on a Canon EOS-1D X body. The lenses were wide open all the time, and at f/2.8, the ISO, which was on Auto setting, went as high as 25,000. I applied noise reduction in post-processing and even converted some image to black-and-white.

More photos here: https://flic.kr/s/aHsk92gBmH

What makes someone good

AA5Q1311_02-14-2015.jpg

I think that ability to clearly formulate what makes something or someone good, i.e. significantly better than average in the specific field, is crucial for making progress in one’s own development and for creating meaningful contributions.

There is a difference between evaluating performance and identifying traits that lead to greatness. Someone might have a potential to be a great artist, researcher, student, etc., but not be performing particularly well at the given moment due to various random reasons. I believe that evaluating performance is relatively easy, but recognizing patterns that lead to greatness is difficult. What might help is drawing parallels with other, seemingly unrelated fields, where such patterns have already been established.

In particular, I find that Japanese martial arts, such as kendo, offer a nearly perfect model for many other areas of human activity. Te reason for this is that nearly everything that we do involves interactions with other people, which can be modelled, at some level of fidelity, as conflicts of varying intensity. Kendo exemplifies an ultimate level of conflict, with all its characteristic elements. After all, it represents a fight to the death.

One lesson from kendo that applies to most areas where continuous improvement of some skill or ability is needed is that a combination of two factors can serve as a fairly reliable indicator of whether someone has a potential to become good at what he/she does: quantity and quality of practice. Quantity is self-explanatory. By quality, I mean presence, conscious engagement with the subject of the activity.

1DX_9557_04-19-2014.jpg

Directing amateur models

AA5Q4785_04-04-2014.jpg

Having too many options can reduce the overall efficiency of a project. This is particularly true for photo shoots that involve amateur models. In contracts to professionals, the amateurs do not have an a priori idea of which poses and camera angles work best for them and how to adjust their posing during the shoot.

For the next high-volume photo shoot at our university’s graduation party, my associate and I decided to give very close directions to the students, whom we are going to photograph, which would drastically limit their choices of available poses. Our hope is tat this would expedite the overall process of running the photo booth and improve the experience of the students by eliminating the stress of choice.

With any photo shoot that involves many people, there is a potential for turning it into a sort of production line, without any creative element. To avoid this, we will try to remain conscious of having fun, interacting with the students, and involving them in the process of creating an artistic composite image in just a few minutes.

AA5Q4692_04-04-2014.jpg

Lock-in effect

http://ow.ly/DItik

In vibrations, the term “lock-in” (or lock-on) refers to the phenomenon of an object oscillating at its natural frequency in response to an excitation by a different frequency. The system is said to be “locked-on” to the natural frequency of the oscillator. In marketing the same term refers to the difficulty of switching to a new product, service or technology, if the the consumer has already invested (often psychologically) into the old product or process.

In both cases the term refers to some inertia associated with the status quo. Since this seems to be a universal phenomenon, it is reasonable to generalize and assume that most people tend to lock-in to their current way of doing things. This refers to the tools and methods they use, how they seek and provide feedback, how they form their opinions, etc. Therefore, a reasonable strategy for differentiating oneself from the crowd (which is pretty much a necessary step for an any artist) would be to consciously fight the lock-in effect, i.e. to be responsive to new inputs (learn new techniques, change the workflow, etc.)

Of course, reacting to every new input has its dangers. Borrowing again the concept from engineering, if the system does not have sufficient damping, it will become unstable, so even small disturbances would lead to huge oscillations. I think that in a creative process, ability to stay true to one’s own “voice” and “style” has the effect of damping: not every subject or technique would resonate with the given photographer, for example. In this case, the unique style is analogous to the natural frequency of the system.

AA5Q4874_03-07-2014.jpg

Making friends

AA5Q5814_12-20-2014.jpg

Involving people in photo projects has tremendous benefits in terms improving the workflow, getting timely feedback, and developing skills, both technical (by learning from others) and social (by the very act of getting involved with people.) This process works best if the people, who are getting involved are friends of the photographer – they are keen to help, it is fun to spend time with friends, etc. Making friends, however, is fundamentally difficult, despite the proliferation (mostly, by social media) of the stigma of not having many friends. In fact, as the number of (superficial) social interactions for a given person increases, the quality (depth) of these interactions decreases. This is not surprising, as true friendships take time to develop, and time is a limited resource for anyone of us.

Gretchen Rubin, the author of “Better Than Before“, points out that a very effective way to make new friends is to befriend the friends of one’s existing friends. This notion, although intuitive, does not solve the problem of making friends initially (when you have none), but fortunately, most people have at least few friends in their lives. The key, then, is to spend more time with friends, explore mutual interests, ask them to involve their other friends… Photography might just be the perfect vehicle for it.

AA5Q4563_04-04-2014.jpg

When to quit

Irish landscape

There is a psychological stigma associated with quitting, yet most people quit many different undertakings over the course of their lives, from childhood hobbies to New Year resolutions to business projects. Seth Godin, actually wrote a book on the subject, called “The Dip.” He argues that quitting can be a valuable tactic, but it should be done not at the point when most people do it (e.g. the 23-rd mile of a marathon). It is best to either quit early in the project, when it is “cheap,” or to stick to it until the end. The definition of “the end” can vary, but imposing (early in the project) a limit on maximum amount of resources that would be spent can help alleviate anxiety towards the end.

I think that a similar approach can be adopted to photo projects. I wrote earlier about the importance of declaring a post-processing stage completed at some point instead of tweaking the image ad infinitum. Perhaps, additional insight can be obtained by analyzing when most photographers quit their processing projects. Once the typical quitting points in the workflow have been established, it would be best to either quit earlier or push beyond them.

The West Coast. Vancouver Island. Canada.

Walk-around lens

AA5Q0375_03-22-2015-Edit.jpg

I decided to follow an example of Alex Ogle, a street reportage photographer who was featured in October 2014 episode of “Pro Photographer, Cheap Camera,” to carry only one lens, namely a 35mm f/1.4L USM, for a family walk in a garden.

The absence of zoom is both limiting and liberating, as no mental energy is wasted on decision-making related to the focal length. Otherwise, the main feature of this lens that distinguishes it from cheaper, consumer-grade lenses is the very wide maximum aperture and excellent sharpness even when fully-opened (at f/1.4). This time, I was shooting in broad daylight, so there was no need to use the lens’s excellent light-gathering ability, but I still wanted to shoot wide open, to produce the subject isolation by blurring the background. To achieve the correct exposure, I had to decrease the shutter speed to 1/1000 s, which had a bonus effect of minimizing camera shake.

The main challenge with shooting at f/1.4 is that a common technique of pre-focussing by half-pressing the shutter button, recomposing and then shooting does not work due to the extremely shallow depth of field. Recomposing would shift the sensor plane sufficiently for the subject to become out-of-focus. Instead, the focus sensor has to be placed precisely on the subject (the front eye, in case of a portrait.) I usually crop the images in post-processing to improve composition.

In my opinion, the results of shooting with a 35mm f/1.4L USM are well worth practicing the shooting technique. The shallow depth of field immediately separates a photo taken with this lens from a mere snapshot.

AA5Q0412_03-22-2015.jpg

On training

5DM3079A1559_11-24-12-Edit.jpg

Training to improve physical fitness not only directly benefits photography by improving work capacity through endurance and enabling certain types of shots that would have been inaccessible for a less fit individual, but it also helps improving one’s skills by developing relevant learning and traing methods.

I wrote earlier about the importance of overcoming self-imposed challenges for developing one’s craft – the photographer’s artistic skill set. This concept is similar to the principle of progressive over-loading used in strength training. Taking the analogy further, it is well know in the world of physical training that continuously increasing the load (e.g. the weight of the barbell) would result in over-training. Increasing the amount of the exercise would eventually lead to the same result: diminishing returns and ultimately, a burnout.

An effective way to challenge one’s fitness level without monotonically increasing the training intensity is to periodically learn a new sport or physical activity, which is known as cross training. I think that in art, such as photography, a similar approach of exploring a new genre or learning a new technique can help in breaking through a creative plateau. Moreover, the habit of regularly trying new things would have a cumulative effect on other related habits, such as involving other people in photo projects, exploring different workflows, composition, lighting, post processing, and publishing media.

AA5Q2574_11-21-2014.jpg

Motion in dance photography

AA5Q9642_01-31-2015-Edit.jpg

Motion and emotion are two elements that can make a photo stand out. Dancing, by definition, involves both of these elements, so it makes an attractive subject for photography.

What makes motion attractive is that it represents something impermanent. Even though the instant is frozen in a static image, the lack of static balance in the dancer’s body implies that this moment is fleeting and therefore precious. Thus, the viewer subconsciously realizes that this photo is an opportunity to observe something that ceased to exist and cannot be recovered. This imbalance, the hint of the impairment nature of the subject is what resonates with the viewer’s emotions. As Allan Watts puts it in his “Wisdom of Insecurity“, “In sculpture, architecture, and painting the finished form stands still, but even so the eye finds pleasure in the form only when it contains a certain lack of symmetry, when, frozen in stone as it may be, it looks as if it were in the midst of motion.”

Incidentally, I generally find “frozen” motion images more appealing and interesting than those with (intentionally) blurred motion. As an engineer, I can speculate that this might be because motion blur implies averaging over time, which is a steady-state component of the motion. The emotional connection with the impermanence of the movement is thus lost in the blurred image.

Recently, I have been working on post-processing of photos that I took during a performance of a local dance school. There was no particular agenda for the photo shoot, i.e. I did not have to capture portraits of all dancers or even cover the entire performance. In that sense, it was the best possible scenario, where I was free to choose what and how to shoot and how many images to deliver.

I found that some types of dances were more photogenic than others. For example, I had far more interesting images of hip-hop than of tap. I think this has to do with the amount of large, exaggerated motion that happens during a articular dance. While hip-hop dancers are almost acrobatic in their movements, the tap performers rarely appear to be out-of-balance at any given instant.

AA5Q0615_01-31-2015-Edit.jpg