Being a third-person shooter

AA5Q6304_06-02-2015.jpg

Some computer games can be categorized as either a first-person or a third-person type. In a first-person game, the player sees the virtual world through the eyes of the character and is not aware of what the character him-/herself looks like. In a third-person game, the player looks at the environment over the character’s shoulder or from above, but in any case, the character is a part of the picture tat the player sees. In other words, when we play a third-person game, we are aware of what we look like in the virtual environment.

Phil Libin, the former CEO of Evernote, mentioned in an interview with Tim Ferriss that different people tend to go through life in either a first-person or a third-person mode. According to him, there are advantages and disadvantages to being aware of one’s own image. I think that even if self-awareness can be distracting from the point of view of pure experience, having the ability to invoke the third-person mode at will is a tremendously useful skill. Taking photography as an example, it is not only important for the photographer to know what image he/she projects to the client, the models, etc., but it is also crucial to make the models aware of what they look like through the lens, so that they can adjust the pose, the makeup, etc.

I wonder what Velázquez, who included himself in the already busy composition of “Las Meninas,” thought about self-awareness and the image he projected in the presence of his royal models…

Being a “third-person shooter” is different from being a slave to the opinion of others, against which there are many warnings, including Hugh MacLeod’s “Ignore Everybody: and 39 Other Keys to Creativity,” for example. It is important to be focussed on the task and the experience at hand, but it is also important to realize that the proverbial big picture includes ourselves in it.

AA5Q3164_04-24-2015-Edit.jpg

California dreaming

AA5Q2805_07-25-2014.jpg

Too much of a good stuff could be not so good, if it is monotonous. We have been having a stretch of incredible warm summer weather in the Pacific North-West, and I overheard one local man saying to another: “I hope it won’t turn into California.”

Granted, these people were both runners, and training outdoors is much more comfortable in cooler weather. Still, I think that this attitude shows that it is important to have variety in whatever we experience, even if things seem to be pretty good at the moment. At the very least, variation would make us appreciate the “ups” more and help cope with future “downs” by putting them into perspective.

AA5Q2099_07-19-2014.jpg

Museums

IMG_2734.jpg
In many museums around the world photography is allowed, provided that no flash or tripod is used. I suspect that both restrictions are made for the convenience of other visitors rather than to prevent photographers from taking high-quality photos. I find this totally acceptable, as it would be extremely tedious to catalogue the museum’s collection anyway. Instead, I think it makes sense to capture the experience of visiting the museum, and for this task, modern cameras with their excellent low-light performance are more than adequate.

AA5Q5464_05-22-2015-Edit-3.jpg

During my visit to the Sforza castle in Milan, I did not even take my fastest lens, instead, I used Canon’s Canon 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM lens on a 1D X body, which gave me ability to zoom in on details of particularly striking exhibits and to capture candid shots of other visitors. In Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam, I used my iPhone to take photos of tourists enjoying some of the most striking works.

I often use my camera in museums purely as a note-taking tool. I take snapshots of the works of art themselves and of the side panels that provide reference information (in the hope that some day, I will actually make time to review these notes and perhaps even make some use of them).

IMG_2769.jpg

On diversification

AA5Q5415_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg

Whether to specialize in a single subject, skill or activity (to “niche down,” in business terms) or to engage in various fields is a true dilemma, as there is no singe correct answer. Perhaps, niching down carries the higher probability of near-term success, while aiming to become a polymath promises more glory. I am not referring to glory in a conventional sense, or rather not only that, but generally a well-rounded and balanced personality and lifestyle, as well as the potential to eventually make a lasting contribution to whatever the field(s) of activity happen(s) to be (just think about Leonardo Da Vinci!)

I came across another appealing reason for diversifying one’s areas of interest in an interview with Stanley McChrystal, a retired 4-star US Army general. He mentioned that being genuinely interested in physical conditioning provided him with an area that was sufficiently separated from what he did professionally, so that even in the face of a crisis situation at work, he was able to think, “the workout today was excellent,” which provided a certain sense of stability.

I think that it is unreasonable to expect a constant rate of improvement at whatever we do, so it might be a good idea to cultivate multiple streams of activity, so that plateau periods in one would not negatively reflect on our overall perception of the situation.

AA5Q5410_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg

Gamer’s mindset

AA5Q8684_02-21-2015.jpg

Jane McGonigal studies how skills and traits cultivated through gaming (particularly, computer gaming) can be applied to solve real-world problems. She uses the term “gameful mindset” to describe the state of anticipation of success at the task we engage in and our willingness to study and utilize our unique strengths, which are analogous to unique “special abilities” in gaming terms.

I think this kind of gameful mindset plays an important role when amateur photographers transition to being professionals. I am not talking about necessarily taking a plunge to become a full-time pro right away. In my case, for example, I enjoy a challenge of tackling professional projects as mini-missions in a computer game. The similarities between them are numerous: in both cases there are challenges to overcome, skills to learn, people to interact with, etc. I always anticipate success at the particular project, but at the same time, because I am not doing photography full-time, the stakes are not so high that failure is not an option.

AA5Q4874_03-07-2014.jpg

On enthusiasm

AA5Q9568_02-27-2015.jpg

According to Maria Popova, the author of an enormously popular blog Brain Pickings, in order for a piece of work to have a chance to become an important and lasting contribution to the field, rather count-intuitively, this work has to be done with only one person in mind as the potential audience – the author him/herself. This applies to nearly all areas of activity, and certainly all creative areas, such as writing, arts, sports, academic work, etc.

The concept is counterintuitive, because we tend to think that value equals popularity. This tendency is based on human’s inherent desire for positive reinforcement, so we mistake interest in our work for evidence of its worthiness and value.

I personally see the grain of truth in the concept of doing the work for ourselves in the fact that doing something consistently, on the daily basis, and fully engaging in the activity (i.e. “showing up”) requires enthusiasm, and it is not possible to be genuinely enthusiastic about something without being interested in it. This echoes Richard Feynman’s story of how he re-discovered scientific research for himself after being burnt out during the work on Manhattan project. He said that decided to work on problems that were fun, without worrying about whether they were already solved by someone else or if they would potentially lead to important discoveries or applications.

With several millions of blog visitors per month, there is no doubt that Popova’s writing is popular. Of course, according to her own thesis, this is not a proof that her contribution is important or that it will be lasting, but she claims to be writing for herself, and her enthusiasm is evident.

AA5Q1230_07-06-2015.jpg

On communication

AA5Q5394_05-22-2015.jpg

Nowadays, almost all tourists carry digital cameras, and a huge number of people take selfies as they travel. I often have fun taking sneaky photos of people photographing themselves, and I find it ironic that while the purpose of taking selfies is obviously to communicate with others (to share them of social media, etc.), people ask others to take their photo for them more and more rarely – the selfie mindset replaces this form of communication.

Of course, asking a stranger to take a photo has disadvantages. For one, there is a psychological barrier of striking a conversation. Perhaps, more importantly, there is no control of how the person would compose a shot. In my experience, the chance of getting a reasonably good photo by asking a random tourist to take it is less than 50%. More often than not, my face would end up dead centre in the frame and/or out-of-focus.

So selfies are not so bad in principle. Perhaps, the premise of taking a selfie is also useful when you want to take a sneaky shot of someone or something else. In “Ronin” (one of my favourite movies) Robert De Niro’s character would not have had to resort to tricks of asking someone to take a picture of himself if he had had an smartphone with a Chinese-made “selfie-stick”.

AA5Q0733_07-04-2015.jpg

AA5Q3167_04-24-2015.jpg

Flowers and cannonballs

AA5Q5393_05-22-2015.jpg
Sforza castle is within an easy walk from the Duomo, in the heart of fashionable Milan. I wondered around in the inner court of the castle when waiting for my time slot to see Leonardo’s “Last Supper” at the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie, which is also located nearby. A couple of other tourists were also killing time for the same reason, sitting on benches by the colourful flower beds filled with poppies.  

The location of the castle in the middle of a modern metropolis is in sharp contrast to the deep moats, surrounding its high walls, the original purpose of which was clear – warfare. A man was throwing frisbee to his dog in the grass-covered moat, and I could not make up my mind what was more out-of-place – this peaceful scene or the stone cannonballs piled up in the moats. I think it’s the former; the calm of a modern city life and seemed like a superficial patina on the tough nature of the place.


AA5Q5278_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg

AA5Q5414_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg

Waiting for the “Last supper”

AA5Q5222_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg
The only way to see Leonardo’s “Last supper” without making a reservation several weeks in advance (which I neglected to do) and without going on one of the overpriced city tours that include a visit to the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie (which were all booked anyway) is to show up at the ticket office at the opening time and buy a ticket for the first available time slot.

After I did that, I had a couple of hours to kill before my designated time. I spent them wondering around in the Sforza castle and its vicinity, taking pictures of random street corners and patterns along the way. Most of these sites are so obscure, that I actually forgot about taking the photos until I reviewed my files a couple of months later.

AA5Q5277_05-22-2015-Edit.jpg

Let me repeat…

AA5Q8522_06-22-2015.jpg
In teaching, it is a common practice to repeat a peace of information several time, hoping that it will eventually reach the majority of the class. Likewise, in marketing, potential consumers are continuously bombarded with repeating advertising messages. There are many examples of this kind of repeatability, and while it obviously works, it is also clear that this approach is wasteful in terms of the information bandwidth that each of us is capable of receiving or transmitting during s typical day (or a lifetime.)

The balance between delivering the message and annoying the audience by unnecessary repeating it is very relevant for photographers. For example, when I want to share my travel photos with friends, I send them a link my Flickr photo stream before I leave for a trip, so that they can follow along, if they like. It turns out that most friends (those who genuinely want to see the photos) visit the link once and expect it to be re-sent periodically as a reminder. Wouldn’t it be nice if each of us was able to cut through the chatter and not need to be repeated things twice? Perhaps, our minds are not wired to capture things right away. But there are certainly exceptions, or rather, exceptional people out there.

Richard Feynman, in his autobiographical “Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” describes an episode when prominent physicists were debating a technical problem, which was a part the Manhattan project. Despite tremendous time pressure, no one felt the need to repeat his statement in order to promote his point of view – there was an implicit trust that the other would hear what was stated just once. As Feynman said, “These were very great men indeed.”

AA5Q0526_07-04-2015.jpg