Using phone camera

IMG_2077 - 2015-01-10 at 12-07-19.jpg

 border=I wrote earlier about my favourite camera apps for iPhone. Currently, I am experimenting with my new iPhone 6 plus, which has a much improved camera, compared to an iPhone 5. To me, the main appeal of the phone camera is that I always have it with me. Of course, despite all the impressive improvements, a phone came is not a DSLR. In order to avoid disappointment, it is important to understand what it can and cannot do. There are many resources for learning this, both online and in print. The book on the right is a good example.

For example, the iPhone camera is excellent for macro shots. It also works amazingly well for shooting well-lit scenes, like the shot in an indoor butterfly garden above. However, the low light performance is quite poor. In other words, the images taken in low light have a lot of noise.

In some cases, noise is quite acceptable. This is true for sports images, for example, although a phone camera would a very poor choice for sports, because of the short focal length of the lens.

IMG_2097 - 2015-01-11 at 07-38-53 (1)-Edit-2.jpg

I took a couple of photos with my iPhone during an early morning hike up Mt. Doug, when it was still dark. It was very foggy and dark, so I new the images would be very noisy. Instead of fighting the noise, I tried to use it to create an artistic effect. After returning home, I brought the photos from my iCloud into Lightroom. The photo of the gnarly tree above had almost no colour in it to begin with, so I slightly increased the contrast and converted it to black-and-white using Nick’s Silver FX plug-in. I used the “Fine Art process” preset, which increases local contrast and brings out small details. I wanted to preserve the noise pattern, because I thought it looked like the surface of a watercolour paper.

The photo of the signal light in the fog (below) reminded me of the Impressionists‘ paintings, so I wanted to play with it’s colours to create an image in that style. In Lightroom, I bumped up noise reduction sliders (both luminance and colour) to very high values, around 50. Of course, this results in significant loss os sharpness and detail, but just like the Impressionists, I was not concerned with these kinds of things. I also increased the saturation of the Blue, Red and Purple colour channels almost to the maximum.

IMG_2095 - 2015-01-11 at 07-37-47.jpg

At the theatre

AA5Q4722_12-07-2014-Edit.jpg

Last Sunday, we took our three-years-old daughter to see her first ballet performance – the Nutcracker. She is really into ballet (to my continuing surprise), and she was looking forward to the show for the last week. I thought that the expectation might be too high, but she really enjoyed the whole theatre-going experience and the show itself, even though she was a bit disappointed that Cinderella was not it it.

I wanted to take a few shots of my daughter at the theatre for our family albums (in a virtual sense – perhaps, actual paper albums would not even exist when she grows up). I knew that an iPhone would not do it, as it is quite dark in the theatre. Fortunately, since we have a young child, we always carry a shoulder bag with some snacks, change of clothes, etc., so I put my Canon EOS-1D X with a 35mm f/1.4L USM lens in it too. I wrote earlier that this is a great camera-lens combination for low-light photography. The 35 mm focal length was also sufficiently wide for taking photos from a very close distance, such as sitting right next to a person.

Having seats next to an aisle was very convenient, as I could back away into the aisle to take a wider shot without disturbing others. Naturally, we only took photos before the performance and during the intermission, as we walked through the hallways, but that was all we really wanted.

The colour of the lighting in the theatre was not flattering for portraits, to say the least. In some shots, the shadows ended up with a purple cast, while the highlights were green – nearly impossible to get a realistic skin tone. In this case, I converted the photos to black and white, which also helped with the noise.

AA5Q4606_12-07-2014.jpg

Family portraits: best lens for shooting in natural light

AA5Q3404_11-29-2014.jpg

When my daughter decided to help baking pancakes on a Saturday morning, I could not resist taking a few snapshots of the process. Something in the very fact of her wanting to help to the best of her ability as a three-year-old (even if it actually creates more work at this age) resonates deeply with me, and I always want to capture the moment and the feeling.

I happened to have a borrowed Canon EF 85mm f1.2L II USM lens that day, so I used it to shoot the portraits of my daughter and wife in our kitchen using natural light from a skylight located directly above them. I shot wide open, at f/1.2, which gives such a shallow depth of field, that the typical kitchen clutter in the background is not very distracting. The wide aperture also lets in a lot of light, which allows the ISO (and therefore, noise) remain relatively low.

The inherent challenge of shooting at f/1.2 is getting acceptable sharpness for both people in the shot. The depth of field is so shallow that if I focus on the closest eye of one person, for example, even other parts of the face of the same person are out of focus, not to mention the other subject(s). As my daughter was busy stirring the batter, I asked my wife to try to move as closely as possible to her and then positioned the camera so that both their faces would be approximately the same distance from it.

Despite being tricky to work with, I think the 85mm f1.2L is the best lens for natural light portraits. It is a bit difficult to define what makes this lens so remarkable, but I think it is the combination of sharpness, bokeh and low noise that makes the images taken with it stand out.

AA5Q3452_11-29-2014.jpg

Customizing camera settings

AA5Q9909_10-04-2014.jpg

Modern professional DSLRs can be customized in nearly every aspect of their operation. My Canon EOS-1D X, for example, has a myriad of settings related just to the operation of the autofocus, from relative priority of achieving focus vs releasing the shutter to tracking sensitivity for moving objects, based on their acceleration.

While it is fun to play with the settings, I find, in practice, that knowing which settings are most critical for particular types of shots and learning how to change them quickly during a photo shoot is sufficient. In fact, it is simply not practical to fumble through all possible variations of settings in order to potentially find the optimal combination. Most likely, doing so will result in missing a shot.

I find that it is useful to become familiar with just a few camera configurations and to learn (through experimentation) which ones do not work for a particular situation. Having said this, I try to re-visit the manual periodically and to make sure that I am fully utilizing the capabilities of the camera.

AA5Q5033_03-07-2014.jpg

On using a monopod

http://ow.ly/DItik

A monopod is not a substitute for a tripod for long exposure shots. It enables only slightly slower shutter speeds than what can be managed by hand-holding the camera. However, there are certain situations where using a monopod is very convenient.

The main advantage of a monopod over a tripod is its smaller footprint, so it can be used in crowded places, such as at sporting events. Sport photography often requires a long telephoto lens (I usually shoot soccer or rugby with a Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM and of course, there is Nikon counterpart: Nikon 300mm f/2.8G AF-S ED VR II). It is important to support a long lens not only to avoid fatigue (these lenses are heavy!), but also to reduce camera shake. At many venues, tripods are not allowed, as they take too much space, but monopods can be used. Sometimes, a monopod can be used as a makeshift stationary camera support in very tight spaces, when it is clamped to some heavy object. I have used it in this way in a research laboratory and also at a sporting arena where tripods were not allowed (by clamping the monopod to advertisement panels that surrounded the pitch).

It is also easier to move around with a monopod, even without folding it, to follow the subject.

There are two options for attaching the monopod to the lens (or camera): using a head or using a lens collar. I tried both methods and found that using a collar is more convenient. In the photo above, Armando has his 500mm f/4L lens attached to a gimbal head. When using a head, it should not be tightened too much, so that the camera can be be turned quickly. An alternative is to attach the lens hood directly to the monopod and tilt the entire system slightly to adjust framing. Since long telephoto lenses have a narrow field of view, small inclinations of the camera result in large changes in the framing. The collar should be kept relatively loose, to be able to quickly change from horizontal to vertical camera orientation. Most telephoto lenses have collars, so monopods are usually sold without a head.

When shooting, I find it convenient to angle the monopod and keep its lover end pressed against my foot. This prevents it from slipping on hard or slippery surfaces.

Genrally, I find a monopod quite useful for sports photography, but I would reach for it only if using a tripod is not allowed, impossible or too cumbersome.

AA5Q1832_10-04-2014.jpg

Shooting position for rugby: following the action

More photos here: http://ow.ly/F89kW

When shooting rugby or soccer, sometimes I stay behind a goal line instead of following the action along the sideline. Besides laziness, there is actually a couple of legitimately good reasons for doing so. The action of these sports looks good from the goal line position – the players face the camera as they run towards the goal. Being stationary also allows me to find a comfortable, low-angle position to shoot from.

On the other hand, following the action along a sideline (when it is allowed, which is not the case at MLS soccer games, for example) provides more opportunities to shoot close-ups of the players and also offers more variety of the action.

This past Saturday was unusually cold for Victoria. In fact, it snowed the night before. Although I dressed for the weather for our university’s rugby game, moving around instead of sitting in one place seemed like a good idea. I wrote before that I usually carry my Canon EOS-1D X with a 300mm f/2.8L IS USM lens on a Black Rapid Y-strap, but this time, I attached the lens to a monopod, which was extended to a height that allowed me to shoot from a standing position. Normally, a lower shooting position, such as standing on one knee, is preferable for sports, but I was willing to sacrifice it for extra mobility (no need to fiddle with the monopod – just set it on the ground, point and shoot). I attached the lens collar directly to the monopod, without a ball head. To frame the shots, I simply tilted the entire monopod. I kept the collar loosely closed around the lens, which allows me to quickly rotate the camera to a vertical shot position.

My associate Armando was shooting the same game from the goal-line, low position using a Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM lens on a Canon EOS 7D Mark II body. With the crop sensor, this combination gave him a very long effective focal lens, allowing to shoot closeups of the action from the opposite side of the pitch. Also, low camera position was excellent for capturing the flying pieces of mud being kicked up by the players.

Between our two shooting positions and different focal lengths used, we captured a good variety of shots from the game.

More photos here: http://ow.ly/F89kW

Basketball photography: autofocus speed

More photos here: http://ow.ly/F5FN8

The main drawback of using the Canon EF 85mm f1.2L II USM lens for shooting indoor basketball is that this lens focusses rather slowly. As I wrote in another post, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, on the other hand, is lightning fast, especially when paired with a built-for-sports DSLR, like a Canon EOS-1D X.

At the yesterday’s game of our university’s team, my associate Armando had an opportunity to directly compare the autofocus speeds of the 1D X and his recently-acquired Canon EOS 7D Mark II. He tried both cameras with a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, and his impression was that the 7D Mark II was slightly slower of the two. We had a hypothesis of why that might be the case: it is possible that this apparent lag in response is due to a lower battery voltage of the 7D Mark II. The massive battery of the 1D X probably drives the motor, which turns the optical elements of the lens, slightly faster.

When shooting a game like basketball, the autofocus speed is critical for being able to follow the rapidly accelerated players. Having said this, yesterday, I still used the 85mm f1.2L II USM lens because of its incredibly shallow depth of field.

Note: The most important of all camera settings to check before starting an action photo shoot is the autofocus mode. It should be set to AI SERVO, which makes the camera to continue tracking the subject if it moves after the focus has been acquired. In contrast, the ONE SHOT mode, while giving more accurate focus on motionless subjects, does not allow continuous tracking of a moving subject.

Untitled

Shooting hockey: dealing with low contrast

AA5Q2133_11-21-2014.jpg

At yesterday’s ice hockey game, I used Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM lens to shoot the action through transparent plastic panels that surrounded the rink for safety of the fans. The panels were covered with scuff marks from the puck hits, which did not interfere with focussing, since the lens hood was, practically, touching the panels. However, the resulting photos showed significant loss of contrast.

I corrected the images in Lightroom by moving “Blacks” slider to the left until the black levels are clipped (around -75 in most of my images). To compensate for the large amount of light reflected from the ice surface, the “Highlights” slider also has be moved to the left (my typical values were around -50).

Generally, I found that the 300mm f/2.8L lens worked well on a full-frame camera (Canon EOS-1D X). A friend of mine was shooting with a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens on his Canon EOS 7D Mark II (with a crop sensor), which gave him more flexibility of a range of focal lengths without sacrificing the reach at the long end of the zoom range.

AA5Q1955_11-21-2014.jpg

Photo backdrop materials

5DM2_MG_5456_10-20-12-Edit.jpg

A good background can greatly enhance a studio photo, whether it is a portrait or a still life. Generally, I try to select a background that ether complements or contrasts with the subject in terms of colour, tone and texture. In terms of material, here are the typical choices, with their advantages and limitations:

Paper

Paper is the least expensive material. It is available in many colours and is a better choice than fabric if you want a smooth background. It is definitely the most versatile material, particularly white paper, because it can be made grey, by limiting the amount of light shining on it, or any other colour by illuminating it with a spot light with a coloured gel on it. On the other hand, black paper is not as good as fabric for creating a solid black background, since it is more reflective.

The disadvantage is that paper gets dirty and wears out relatively quickly (from models standing on it). It can be argued that considering the cost of replacement, paper is the most expensive choice over a long time. However, the dirty part of the paper would be only under the models’ feet, where it is typically not very noticeable in the photos. Also, I have learned about a hack (is it the new work for “trick”?) of using a 4′ x 8′ of glossy white wallboard from a home improvement store as the surface for the models to stand on (the paper would be underneath the plastic). The line where the paper and the plastic meet would not be visible in the photo, since the paper curves under the plastic sheet.

5DM2_MG_0725_05-10-12-Edit.jpg

Fabric

Cloth backgrounds are slightly more expensive than paper. They can be changed very easily, and are more durable than paper, but it’s not recommended to stand on them.

Fabric is the material of choice for the black background. Conversely, it does not work well for solid white background – you would need ridiculous amounts of light to blow out the shadows on the tiny wrinkles. With white or grey fabric, any colour, except for very saturated colours,  can be created by using spotlights with gels. I also like mottled cloth backgrounds: I have one in cool grey and one in warm brown colour. I find that it’s almost necessary to blur the fabric background by using shallow depth of field.

Another feature to consider is the amount of storage space the background requires when not in use. If you don’t have  a dedicated studio space that is set up for photography all the time, then fabric backgrounds take the least amount of space when folded for storage.

Vinyl

Vinyl backgrounds are heavier and more durable, but also more expensive. They crease easily and slippery to walk on.

support stand is needed for any type of background, and in case of fabric, some clamps are very handy.

Note: While green or backgrounds are commonly used for composite video, it is much better to use a grey background for composite photos. The reason is that a green background would cast a very unnatural reflected light on the edge of the model (e.g. the tiny hairs on the skin), and it would be very difficult to make a selection in Photoshop to get rid of this green edge light.

My iPhone camera apps

Autumn tree

Here are the camera apps I currently have on my iPhone 5, which has been my pocket camera for the last couple of years. While I would not want to shoot a serious project with it, it is invaluable for capturing fleeting family moments and quickly sharing them with friends on social media. There is a great number of third -party camera apps for the iPhone, but to me personally, the deciding factors for choosing a particular one to use are

  • easy access to my most used features, and
  • intuitive interface (because I want to use the phone camera to capture the moments, not fumble through menus and settings).

For those reasons, I have these thee apps on my front screen.

Camera (native iOS app)

The native iOS app for controlling the camera (intuitively called “Camera”) has been greatly improved in iOS 8.x. I particularly like the integration of the image editing tools, which makes basic, high-impact adjustments, such as cropping, easy and intuitive.

In terms of managing of the photos, everything captured by Camera automatically goes to the Photo Stream in the iCloud, which I look through every month or so and pull the best shots in to my Lightroom library, which serves as the reference for my archives.

Camera+ ($1.99)

This is my go-to app, primarily because of its ability to set the focus and exposure points separately by dragging their icons on the screen. There is also an on-screen exposure compensation slider that lets you adjust the overall exposure. However, this is just a software feature, rather than an aperture/shutter speed/ISO adjustment found on a DSLR camera. Thus, I prefer to leave the exposure correction to the post-processing step in order to keep things simple and quick during shooting.

ProCamera ($4.99)

This app also has the separate exposure and focus settings, which is the must for my style of shooting. In addition, it has an ISO Boost mode, which raises the maximum ISO from 800 to 3200, allowing faster shutter speeds. Also, if the lash of the phone is set to torch mode, the intensity of the light can be adjusted. Note that the torch mode is a huge drain on the iPhone’s battery. In addition, there is a Night Camera mode, which allows exposures as slow as 1 sec. One really needs a tripod for this kind of shooting, which kind of defeats the purpose of a super-compact, pocket camera. In ProCamera, you can specify the level of JPEG compression (or save the photos in TIFF format), and the volume buttons of the phone can be used to trigger the shutter.

I am looking forward to receiving my new iPhone 6 Plus, with its new and improved camera hardware. My goal is to take iPhone photography a bit more seriously and,  through practice, determine a set of conditions/situations where the phone camera can reliably produce good results. I have a sense that I will be using more and more of the post-processing features of the phone. Normally, I avoid heavy processing of my photos, but for the iPhone shots, the artistic filters are half of the fun. The image quality of the original photo is often not particularly high, compared to that taken with a full-frame pro DSLR, which often releases my creativity.

Generally, looking at and reading about the work of others has been invaluable for developing my own skills. Recently, there emerged a vast body of resources on iPhone photography, such as this book that brings together variety of styles, subjects and software tools use by some of the best artists in this field.

Sun rays filtering through tree branches in Mount Douglas Park. Victoria, BC, Canada.